Leaders cannot motivate their employees
Employees of fashion house Christian Dior applaud after the Christian Dior Spring/Summer 2012 ready-to-wear collection show on March 4, 2011 in Paris. (FRANCOIS GUILLOT) Much of what we read about employee motivation suggests it’s the job of leaders and managers, as though employees are incapable of doing so themselves.
The assumption that people are naturally unmotivated has created a large market for books, videos and training workshops for leaders. They end up working harder at trying to keep their people motivated than their employees do. In the long run they end up fostering dependence and a sense of entitlement in those employees, who come to rely on their leaders to tell them what to do and how they should feel about their work.
What leaders need to do is spend more time trying to understand what they do that demotivates their employees. Motivation is an emotional issue, not a rational one, and you can’t tell an employee to get excited about work if they don’t feel it. It is surprising how many leaders get angry at their employees for this very thing. How employees feel about themselves while engaging in their work is the strongest determinant of the level of motivation they will demonstrate.
Emotions are the energetic force behind motivation, meaningful experiences and interactions at work. They are an essential and undeniable part of everyday organizational life. Demotivation, on the other hand, is an emotional state of overall dissatisfaction, where employees withhold their energy or use it against the leaders and organizations. It can be defined as a reduction in the emotional energy that is directed toward achieving the goals of the business.
A demotivated employee is one who appears apathetic, disinterested or simply exhibits an attitude of entitlement, all contributing to productivity losses at work. Presenteeism, higher absenteeism, complaining, disorganized work spaces, or even just inattentiveness to timelines and performance expectations are some of the symptoms. Lack of motivation is also seen in “acting out” or counterproductive work behaviours such as aggression, hostility, lack of respect for authority or theft.
Frustrated with trying to motivate employees or to figure out what is “wrong” with them, leaders can resort to forcing, shaming or intimidating employees into better performance. Although this approach may give leaders the idea that they are back in control, the result is generally fleeting. Forcing employees or motivating them through fear can help leaders achieve their goals in the short term, but it will ultimately contribute to employee unrest, sabotage, or high turnover with its inherent loss of skills and knowledge.
How employees feel about themselves at work is critical to their capacity to direct their energy toward achieving the goals of the company. When leaders fail to understand this they can inadvertently, unconsciously or unwittingly end up demotivating their employees.
Here are some things that employees often feel because of their leader’s behaviour:
Overwhelmed or overextended: Because leaders are willing to work long and hard to achieve results, they can communicate verbally or nonverbally that they expect employees to do so as well. Employees end up feeling little satisfaction as they can’t work to the best of their ability.
Unappreciated: A lack of appreciation from leaders can make employees feel resentful and used. Being appreciated for insignificant contributions or things that are not of value to the employee causes the same feeling.
Insecure or anxious: Nit-picking and micromanaging employees leads to an anxious work force, afraid to initiate anything without being told. A lack of clarity or definition around tasks and timelines also causes employees to doubt themselves.
Devalued or shamed: Leaders who use indirect communication or sarcasm when employees disagree with their ideas can cause fear and shame. Employees feel devalued when leaders are dismissive of their ideas and input.
Helpless or powerless: Observing unfair practices such as favouritism, the rewarding of poor performance or the fostering of competition among team members is upsetting to most employees as they don’t feel empowered to do anything about it. They will stop caring and feel contempt for their leader.
Feeling untrustworthy: When leaders withhold information or dole it out on a “need-to-know” basis, they inadvertently communicate to employees that they don’t trust them.
Feeling blamed: Leaders who fail to ensure that employees understand what is expected of them can end up treating those workers as though they are not doing their job or are incompetent. They cause them to feel anger and resentment by blaming them.
Although leaders can’t motivate employees, they can create an environment or a culture in which employees feel a desire to contribute and invest their energy. Leaders must be aware of how their behaviour makes people feel and how it impacts the motivation and performance of their employees. The question they need to ask themselves is: “How is my behaviour making my employees feel?” Then they can gradually shift the emotional and energetic climate at work.
Special to The Globe and Mail Anne Dranitsaris, PhD, is a corporate therapist, author and creator of the Striving Styles Personality System – which helps people, leaders and organizations achieve their potential. She is a published and prolific writer on emotional intelligence, personality type and behaviour in organizations.
Published on Wednesday, Mar. 09, 2011 9:56AM EST
And a comment to this post by Nigel Copsey reads:
"Forget motivational theory. You don't need it." - Peter Drucker.
"You can take a horse to water but you can't make it drink' is a fallacy. All you have to do is make sure it is thirsty first." - (Can't remember who!)
I think too many managers are too busy managing and managing people - telling them what to do and how to do it right - because "that is my job". As a result, it is difficult for their direct reports to be motivated or engaged.
Having experimented with this myself, I find people generally responding positively to being given the latitude and encouragement to think about their job: find easier, better & fun ways of doing it, determine what is in fact necessary and what actually isn't, be given the responsibility to deal with problems/challenges themselves ... etc.
Similarly with aspirations: where do they want to go and how can they build the skills, knowledge, experience etc. to get there?
When we allow people to do what they want to do and determine their own future (within reason and policy), they are in more charge of their working life and feel in control of their own destiny. They are working for themselves.
If we manage them, they are more likely to feel like "another cog in the wheel" and do things almost robotically. This can lead to a loss of self-worth, stress ... and also to poorer performance, and staff attrition.
"You can take a horse to water but you can't make it drink' is a fallacy. All you have to do is make sure it is thirsty first." - (Can't remember who!)
I think too many managers are too busy managing and managing people - telling them what to do and how to do it right - because "that is my job". As a result, it is difficult for their direct reports to be motivated or engaged.
Having experimented with this myself, I find people generally responding positively to being given the latitude and encouragement to think about their job: find easier, better & fun ways of doing it, determine what is in fact necessary and what actually isn't, be given the responsibility to deal with problems/challenges themselves ... etc.
Similarly with aspirations: where do they want to go and how can they build the skills, knowledge, experience etc. to get there?
When we allow people to do what they want to do and determine their own future (within reason and policy), they are in more charge of their working life and feel in control of their own destiny. They are working for themselves.
If we manage them, they are more likely to feel like "another cog in the wheel" and do things almost robotically. This can lead to a loss of self-worth, stress ... and also to poorer performance, and staff attrition.
And another comment by Julie Stewart to this post:
I definitely agree with Tara that engaging their employees can make a huge difference in motivation. When you get people's buy-in their attitude will shift from an "I have to" to an "I get to" attitude. Here's a great article that goes into more detail about how much more succesful engaging leaders can be.
http://www.leadstrat.com/resources-leadership-engaging-leader.html
http://www.leadstrat.com/resources-leadership-engaging-leader.html
No comments:
Post a Comment